Brake response is faster since weight is already where the braking power is. Provides more stability while accelerating. Lower front and higher rear ride height - the weight of the car is shifted towards the front. Negative rake is not in use in racing.“I think that’s the right thing to do. The lack of pace and results led the team, owned by Canadian billionaire Lawrence Stroll, to feel significantly disadvantaged by the aerodynamic regulations introduced by the FIA at the start of the 2021 season.Team Principal Otmar Szafnauer plans on initiating discussions with the federation with hopes for regulation changes that would work to bridge the gap between low rake and high rake cars. All of them with Lance Stroll. Negative CamberAston Martin, formerly Racing Point, is at the centre of another controversy.But if last year they were under fire for being too good too quick while displaying huge similarities to the Mercedes car, this time around they find themselves at the other end of the spectrum, having to deal with a lacklustre 2021 challenger.After two races, Aston Martin was only able to add five points to the standings. A wheel is said to have a Positive camber if top of the wheel is tilts out.Matter of fact, Mercedes is leading them both as of now, even if Red Bull seems to have the upper hand at the moment and have a realistic shot at the trophies since they last won them in 2013.Lance Stroll has collected all five Aston Martin championship points two races into the season (Photo: Aston Martin/Twitter)Aston Martin, on the other hand, is struggling. It put a damper on their performance as both teams are now unable to seal the floor edges, therefore having less downforce.The German team took a hit in performance, but it still able to compete for the drivers’ and constructors’ championships. Every team had to trim their car floors to generate less downforce and extend the current Pirelli tires lifespan in a year, since the new cars supposed to be introduced in 2021 got pushed back a season due to the pandemic.For Mercedes and Aston Martin, losing the floor edges they depend on for downforce generation was a huge hit. With the large floor volume, low rake cars have the potential to lose downforce if they are unable to seal the large gaps of volume on the car floor and floor edges.Then came 2021. The higher rear end angle enables cars to generate more downforce from the floor and the diffuser than Mercedes and Aston Martin, the only teams using a lower rake angle.Instead, these two teams run a low rake angle due to a longer wheelbase that creates more floor volume, allowing the diffuser to increase airflow just enough for the car to generate high downforce.The other eight teams’ decision to run high rake is due to the tricky circumstances that come about from running low rake. But at the same time, we should be having the discussions with the FIA to make it a bit more equitable.”But what changed in the rules to cause such a dip in performance?Racing teams across the grid have adopted high rake designs since its debut with Red Bull’s 2011 RB7 car.
![]() After all, this is a Mercedes”, said Red Bull advisor Helmut Marko alluding to the similarities between both cars.Red Bull team principal Christian Horner also dismissed Aston Martin’s complaints. They (Aston Martin) should just make sure they get the same information from Mercedes. Especially when rival teams are doing their best to attack Aston Martin’s intentions.“The rules have changed for safety reasons and Mercedes has managed to come up with a good car. That is grip, and that is lap time.”So, why don’t Aston Martin adapt the car into a high rake concept then? It’s not that simple.Since both Mercedes and Aston Martin’s car compositions work based on the low rake angle concept, to change it would open the door to many other significant problems. Fighting the regulations really is the last and probably only resort Aston Martin has at salvaging the 2021 season.To move in that direction with the season underway, however, is most likely fighting for something that can’t be achieved. But when we turned up at first race we definitely saw we have been affected much more than the competition,” said Canadian driver Lance Stroll.“There are characteristics between the two philosophies and it turned out we lost a lot of (downforce) load relative to the higher rake cars with the regulation changes. Avenir next font familyBut the unexpected hit the new regulations represented to the team wasn’t on the plans.Before 2022 comes about and shuffles the grid’s pecking order, the Canadian-owned team has to deal with a new challenge. That’s why I respect Aston Martin’s enquiry into the whole thing,” Wolff said.He further stated that he felt the regulations may have been targeted at Mercedes, leaving Aston Martin as “collateral damage,” as the German team may have lost its dominance but it still able to contend for the title.After a strong 2020 season, Aston Martin looked eager to keep improving under its new name and colours and by adding four-time world champion Sebastian Vettel to its rankings. “I think there is certainly the right to review, to look at things and discuss them with the FIA to find out what has actually happened, and how have things happened. I’m struggling to get my head around that.”Mattia Binotto and Franz Tost, Ferrari and AlphaTauri team principals, have also criticized Aston Martin’s intentions.This leaves Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff as Szafnauer’s only ally again. They were all voted through unanimously,” he said.“It seems a little naive to think that suddenly the rules are going to get changed after the sample of a single race after the process has been fully followed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTyra ArchivesCategories |